And thats why high skilled immigrants travel to developed countries. To make more money. Also the competition in countries like India and China are easily 10000x higher than in the USA or Australia. And the winners of the rat race there can thrive here.
How embarassing that India has "more competition" and yet is worse at literally everything.
Meanwhile most Aussie people don't really have that level of knowledge.
How embarassing that us dumb Aussie people made a better country in 200 years than these superior indians made in THOUSANDS of years!
Compare an engineering test here to that in India or China.
India did so poorly on PISA tests - standardised international student assessments - they literally stopped doing them!
When Indians are actually compared against students in other countries in a standardised fashion, they do TERRIBLY. Vastly, vastly worse than students in Australia. It completely exposed the myth of indian academic excellence.
Immigrants are simply better in high skilled jobs,
No, they're not.
and they are far more easier
You brag about being smarter than Australians and yet you make primary school level grammatical errors.
Also, give me an example of people in the Palestinian protests attacking white people.
They should upskill instead of complaining that their jobs are taken away by immigrants.
Why doesn't china have large scale immigration then? If it's so beneficial, why not let as many indians in as want to come in? Could it be that they make life worse for the existing population.
And AGAIN, "upskilling" doesn't make housing any cheaper or available. "Upskilling" doesn't magically make roads less crowded or medical wait times any shorter. "Upskilling" doesn't make ethnics on the train smell any less bad.
So, really mate, you saying Australia doesn't need immigrants is not based on any fact but completely based on BS and bigotry.
Why aren't china bigots for not letting in immigrants?
And bigotry? Indians literally consider hundreds of millions of indians "untouchables". They're the most bigoted people on the planet.
1. Crusades (1 to 3 million deaths)
Hey dumb dumb, these were a reponse to MUSLIM INVASIONS.
2. Invasion and colonisation of Americas (50 to 90 million)
Nearly all of the decline in population was due to infectious disease and outbreeding, not killing.
3. Slavery (12 to 15 million shipped from Africa to Americas, estimated that double that have died in transit)
lmao
Muslims were involved with the african trade earlier than europeans and for longer than europeans, and many of the slaves taken to the america were enslaved and sold by muslims in the first place
Europeans also abolished slavery well before muslims did, and no muslim anywhere has ever even pretended to feel bad about muslims' history of slavery, meanwhile in the US kids are taught from birth how bad america was its history of slavery.
Of course, the holy prophet of islam himself condoned slavery, owned slaves, traded slaves and enslaved people
And today, the countries who practice the most modern day slavery are Saudi Arabia, Türkiye, Tajikistan, the United Arab Emirates, Russia, Afghanistan, and Kuwait. All except Russia are MUSLIM majority. Centuries after europeans abolished slavery and muslims still practice it. And then they try and act self-righteous condemning europeans. Pathetic.
4. Thirty years war (8 million deaths)
This was an intraeuropean war 400 YEARS ago. Compeltely irrelevant.
5. Colonisation of Oceania (No exact estimate, but believed to be in the millions)
Again, almost none of this was deliberate killing.
6. India under the british (estimated 35 to 45 million deaths under colonisation)
LMAO
Muslims killed and enslaved vastly more before the british. The british saved india from muslim oppression.
7. China (Roughly 10000 to 20000 deaths in the opium war, but historians argue that there are millions more dead as a result of foreign intrusion through famines)
By your logic, China has no right to cry about this because the most deadly conflicts in history were chinese civil wars.
11. WW1 and WW2: 10 to 20 million soldiers dead from colonised countries like the British Raj in WW1, and 25 to 30 million in WW2.
You're just making up numbers now lmao
Nobody has more blood in their hands than European colonisers. Don't act like they are innocent and evil stems from immigrants and people of colour.
The ONLY reasons muslims never conquered the world is because they couldn't. They have never even pretended to feel bad about their long history of brutal conquest and slavery. Muslims have been invading Europe for almost 1400 years and they are proud of this fact.
And none of this explains why it's alright for China to have strict immigration policies.[/QUOTE]